Financial Times vs LinkedIn Pulse
Complete guest post comparison for 2026. See which site offers better value for your SEO strategy.
Financial Times
ft.com
DA 93$2000
Wins 1 of 8
VS
LinkedIn Pulse
linkedin.com
DA 99Free
Winner
Wins 6 of 8
Detailed Comparison
DA 93
Domain Authority
DA 99
50.0M
Monthly Traffic
1200.0M
$2000
Guest Post Price
Free
4.5/5
User Rating
4.7/5
0 reviews
Total Reviews
3 reviews
4h
Avg. Indexing Time
2h
80%
Success Rate
79%
N/A
Turnaround Time
N/A
Standard content only
Content Types
Standard content only
Our Verdict
LinkedIn Pulse wins! With 6 wins across our comparison metrics,LinkedIn Pulse edges out the competition.Key advantages: DA 99, free pricing, and 1200.0M monthly traffic.However, Financial Times might be better if you're looking for different niche coverage.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Financial Times or LinkedIn Pulse better for guest posts?
Based on our comparison, LinkedIn Pulse wins in 6 out of 8 categories. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs and budget.
What's the price difference between Financial Times and LinkedIn Pulse?
Financial Times charges $2000 while LinkedIn Pulse charges nothing (free). That's a $2000 difference.
Which site has higher domain authority: Financial Times or LinkedIn Pulse?
LinkedIn Pulse has a higher DA of 99 compared to 93. Higher DA typically means more link value.
Do Financial Times and LinkedIn Pulse accept casino/crypto content?
Financial Times: ✗ No casino, ✗ No crypto. LinkedIn Pulse: ✗ No casino, ✗ No crypto.
How do I get a guest post on Financial Times or LinkedIn Pulse?
Use ParasiteRank to unlock direct editor contacts. This saves you 40-60% compared to going through agencies. Click "Unlock Contact" on either site's page to get direct access.