New York Times vs GitHub

Complete guest post comparison for 2026. See which site offers better value for your SEO strategy.

New York Times logo
New York Times
nytimes.com
DA 95$3000
Wins 1 of 8
VS
GitHub logo
GitHub
github.com
DA 97Free
Winner
Wins 4 of 8

Detailed Comparison

DA 95
Domain Authority
DA 97
250.0M
Monthly Traffic
300.0M
$3000
Guest Post Price
Free
5.0/5
User Rating
5.0/5
2 reviews
Total Reviews
2 reviews
2.5h
Avg. Indexing Time
1.5h
89%
Success Rate
81%
N/A
Turnaround Time
N/A
Standard content only
Content Types
Crypto

Our Verdict

GitHub wins! With 4 wins across our comparison metrics,GitHub edges out the competition.Key advantages: DA 97, free pricing, and 300.0M monthly traffic.However, New York Times might be better if you're looking for different niche coverage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is New York Times or GitHub better for guest posts?

Based on our comparison, GitHub wins in 4 out of 8 categories. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs and budget.

What's the price difference between New York Times and GitHub?

New York Times charges $3000 while GitHub charges nothing (free). That's a $3000 difference.

Which site has higher domain authority: New York Times or GitHub?

GitHub has a higher DA of 97 compared to 95. Higher DA typically means more link value.

Do New York Times and GitHub accept casino/crypto content?

New York Times: ✗ No casino, ✗ No crypto. GitHub: ✗ No casino, ✓ Accepts crypto.

How do I get a guest post on New York Times or GitHub?

Use ParasiteRank to unlock direct editor contacts. This saves you 40-60% compared to going through agencies. Click "Unlock Contact" on either site's page to get direct access.

Related Comparisons

Explore More